Use of Less-Lethal Force Policy
Threat Assessment: Officers should assess the level of threat posed by a subject before deciding to use less-lethal force. This involves evaluating the individual's behavior, the severity of the threat, and the availability of alternative methods to gain control.
Proportional Response: Officers should use less-lethal force that is proportionate to the threat encountered. The force used should be no greater than necessary to achieve the legitimate law enforcement objective, taking into consideration the subject's actions and the potential for harm to officers or others.
Warning and Verbal Commands: If feasible and safe to do so, officers should provide clear verbal warnings and commands to the subject before deploying less-lethal force. This allows the subject an opportunity to comply and can help de-escalate the situation.
Targeting and Minimization of Injury: Officers should aim less-lethal force at specific body areas to minimize the risk of serious injury. Efforts should be made to avoid striking sensitive areas such as the head, neck, or groin, unless the situation justifies it as a last resort.
Continual Assessment and Adjustments: Officers should continually assess the effectiveness of the less-lethal force being used. If the force is not achieving the desired result or if the threat level changes, officers should be prepared to adjust their tactics accordingly.
Training and Familiarity: Officers should receive proper training on the deployment and use of less-lethal force options. This includes understanding the capabilities and limitations of each tool or technique, as well as practicing their use in simulated scenarios.
Aftercare and Reporting: After using less-lethal force, officers should provide necessary aftercare to individuals who have been subjected to it. This may involve calling for medical assistance, ensuring decontamination from chemical agents if applicable, and documenting the use of force in accordance with agency procedures.
Review and Accountability: Agencies should have mechanisms in place to review and evaluate incidents involving the use of less-lethal force. This helps ensure compliance with policy, identify training needs, and hold officers accountable for their actions.
It is crucial for officers to familiarize themselves with their agency's specific Use of Less-Lethal Force Policy and receive proper training on its implementation. Officers should exercise sound judgment, prioritize safety, and use less-lethal force as a measured response in situations where it is necessary and appropriate to protect themselves or others while minimizing the risk of serious harm.